Through you Editor, permit me to offer a response to an article, Cut it out – for you are bigger than that! by one Comrade Lawyer, page 5 in the May 29th issue of New Today. The article made reference to the recent Annual General Meeting of the Grenada Bar Association which resulted in an unprecedented tie between the incumbent President Ruggles Ferguson and the challenger James Bristol, each receiving eighteen (18 votes), “making it absolutely necessary for fresh elections to be held in breaking this tie”.
Comrade Lawyer suggests that Mr. Ferguson’s busy schedule “renders him unable to provide the energetic stewardship of the Grenada Bar Association at a time WHEN THE PROFESSION NEEDS FIXING (my emphasis), which Mr. James Bristol may well be able to accomplish.”
Comrade Lawyer further suggests that Mr. Ferguson should have “done the honourable and mature thing and GIVE WAY (my emphasis) to Mr. Bristol. After all, Mr. Ferguson can only be perceived as being senior to Mr. Bristol in terms of the fraternity’s associations of its members – being the President of the OECS Bar.
Let me clarify from the onset. I am an interested party here because the incumbent President of the Bar, Mr. Ferguson, is my BROTHER. He does not need me to come to his defence. He is well capable of doing that himself. I write on my own volition since I feel compelled to offer some observations both as a sister and as a citizen.
First of all, why would Comrade Lawyer need to use a pseudonym to address this issue? What is his/her objective in writing this article?
I fail to understand his/her point in suggesting that Mr. Ferguson should have done the “honourable and mature thing and give way to Mr. Bristol”. There was a tie. Is he suggesting that Mr. Bristol was ENTITLED to the post of President? Is this what Comrade Lawyer was suggesting when he stated, Mr. Ferguson can only be “perceived as being senior to Mr. Bristol in terms of the fraternity’s associations
of its members – being the President of the OECS Bar”.
It is a fact that Mr. Bristol has been a practicing lawyer much longer than Mr. Ferguson. SO WHAT? Mr. Ferguson has had a long and illustrious relationship with the Grenada Bar Association.
Immediately upon being called to the bar in September 1996, he became involved in the almost dead and irrelevant association, Grenada Association of Lawyers (GAOL), that had been led by very senior members of the fraternity. He was a very COMMITTED, HARD WORKING Secretary and then President.
There is no doubt that his energy, enthusiasm, commitment and ability
to work with people played a major role in the Association rising from the ashes to become a household word in Grenada and in the OECS.
Among the many programmes which have become institutional and associated with the Grenada Bar since Mr. Ferguson became a member of its executive are Grenada Law Week, the Sir Archibald Nedd Lecture and public legal education. Indeed, the experience in Grenada has served to catalyze other associations in the OECS, some of whom are taking a page out of some of the best practices in Grenada.
Mr. Ferguson humanized the Bar Association and forged a connection, however tenuous between the law and the wider society. He is a people’s person, one who always has time for LITTLE people and one who makes time TO SERVE no matter his busy schedule.
Comrade Lawyer seems to forget that Mr. James Bristol was the immediate President before Mr. Ruggles Ferguson again became President in 2014. And in the period before Mr. James Bristol became Attorney-General in 2008, he succeeded Mr. Ferguson as President.
What is Mr. Bristol’s TRACK RECORD? What has been his particular contribution to the Grenada Bar Association during those periods or to Grenada while being the President of the Grenada Bar Association that makes such a compelling case that Ferguson should do the “honourable and mature thing and give way to Mr. Bristol”?
Sometime ago (it was around November 18th 2014), I heard Mr. Bristol on a programme, Sundays with George Grant for which he was widely applauded http://www.grenadabroadcast.com/the-radio-show/media-files/18478-jimmy-bristol-at-his-best.
He spoke about many things – Constitution Reform, selling passports, the misdirection in which the economy was going. I smiled.
There were some things on which he spoke in respect of the economy and environment, he sounded like he might have been part of the Citizens in Defence of Grenada’s Lands and Heritage!!! And I thought to myself,” Welcome aboard Mr. Bristol! Where were you all this time?”
It would seem that Mr. Bristol is experiencing renaissance. Indeed, I often hear him on another programme where he shares the “Word” and his reflections on it, and the peace and joy that comes from this renaissance. He encourages those of us who have not yet arrived at that place to seek it. From time to time, he gives a peek into his own experiences and admits to the imperfections of human frailty.
When Mr. Bristol started talking about Constitution Reform and the Constitution Reform Advisory Committee, I paid particular attention.
He talked about the DEFICIENCIES of the process and the Committee.
From the response of listeners via the Shout Box and telephone calls,
it appeared that he “won friends and influenced people” including Citizen John Rullow, perhaps the nation’s most well known citizen advocate on Constitution Reform.
I am the first to acknowledge that there was great merit in a number of observations made by Mr. Bristol who at the time was the immediate past President of the Grenada Bar Association, having demitted office sometime around mid-2014. But all of that paled in comparison to the following pronouncements/observations made by Mr. Bristol which, in my humble opinion, demonstrated human frailty big time:-
Grenada Bar Association never knew anything about the process.
He, Mr. Bristol, did not know anything about the composition of the Committee until he found out about it on the Internet.
The Grenada Bar has never met and taken a position on Constitution Reform.
Nothing has been brought to the Bar.
Yet, there was a representative of the Grenada Bar Association on the Constitution Reform Advisory Committee in the name of Dr. Lawrence Joseph who was a member of the Executive of the Bar Association under Mr. Bristol’s watch. There was a media launch of the CRAC and there were frequent broadcasts on GIS re the community consultations that took place, imperfect as they were.
Can one conclude that Dr. Joseph took it upon himself to represent the Bar on CRAC? That he was not endorsed by the rest of the Executive or membership? And Mr. Bristol and his Executive was unaware all of this time? Were they sleeping or did they have very busy schedules that did not allow them to engage?
How could it be that the Bar’s representative did not provide any feedback to the membership?
Can it be really possible that President and membership were unaware and did not ask a question or make a statement for such an extended period? Or did they have other priorities?
Is Mr. Bristol suggesting that not a single member of the Executive or wider membership asked a question or raised objection?
This is ASTOUNDING. The Grenada Bar was really in a SAD state. And herein lies the malaise which afflicts Grenada that Comrade Lawyer alluded to – the stewardship of a key organisation which should be proactive in raising the awareness of the general population on a key issue – such as influencing the process of Constitution Reform.
And what is even MORE astounding is that Mr. Bristol would actually make such a FAUX PAS on radio, apparently blissfully unaware of the implications of his statements. Or is it that he underestimated the listeners? It seems to me that Bristol missed the boat.
Is this the kind of stewardship that Comrade Lawyer suggests:- would fix the Grenada Bar Association? that Mr. Ferguson should step aside for – do the “honourable and mature thing and give way to Mr. Bristol”; demonstrates Mr. Bristol’s seniority to Mr. Ferguson – who according to Comrade Lawyer is only “perceived as being senior to Mr. Bristol in terms of the fraternity’s associations of its members – being the President of the OECS Bar”?
Hell, NO!! Let there be elections! Let Mr. Bristol and his supporters do the work for an outright decision – mobilise and organise!! Mr. Ferguson is a product of the revolution. He understands organise and mobilise well.
Mr. Bristol himself spoke about the need for public education. And whether or not the erudite Mr. Bristol becomes the President of the Grenada Bar Association, permit me to suggest how he could make some very meaningful contributions to “fixing” Grenada by contributing to raising public awareness and consciousness:-
He could offer contributions to the newspapers. Unlike Dr. Joseph, he does not have to offer weekly contributions. But at least one a month would be welcome. Whether or not one agrees with the views of Dr. Joseph is another matter but he is contributing to the debate.
He could offer to do a Legal Education radio programme. I know that a programme has replaced Barbara Lindo’s programme on GBN. I am not sure whether or not it is under the auspices of the Grenada Bar. He could get a spot on that monthly. Chime FM would welcome a programme. He could also do the programme on GIS from where it would be disseminated to all the radio stations.
Once a quarter, he could organise a public forum and an issue could be debated.
And as a senior member of the fraternity, he could encourage/motivate his fellow members of the Grenada Bar as to how they could individually, collectively, and more effectively contribute their knowledge and expertise to national development processes.
I will deliberately refrain from going into issues on which I have already written about and on which I feel very strongly re Mr. Bristol’s tenure as the Attorney-General of Grenada which does not inspire my confidence in Mr. Bristol, but there is redemption and forgiveness.
Suffice it to say that, to date, I have not heard any public utterances from Mr. Bristol which suggest that renaissance has provided another perspective on those matters.
In closing let me salute my brother for the selfless contributions that he has made and continues to make in spheres of public life in Grenada and the region. Mom lived to see some of it! And Dad would have been so proud of him!!
Sandra C.A. Ferguson